Compare wavelab elements to pro6/14/2023 ![]() Audio, Reference, and Video tracks boast a new track header design with dedicated controls for each track type. The Audio Montage window has also been overhauled. The Montage Inspector is divided into dedicated Clip, Track, and Output Inspector sections and sports a color tool, name field, and tabs for Effect, Gain, and Slot, each with access to a broad array of menu commands. With the Montage Inspector, plug-in functions like channel processing, signal routing, preset loading, and bypass, are streamlined and consistent with the Master Section. WaveLab Elements 10 completely retools the Effect Tool Window of previous versions, renaming it the Montage Inspector and giving it a Master Section-like look. Overhauled Audio Montage window for lightning-fast album creation It’s the ultimate back-up solution! And the Audio Montage and Audio Editor workspaces each have their own independent undo/redo log, which keeps your sessions organized and running smooth. Edit markers in the Audio Editor enable you to see where audio parts have been edited, which makes recovering earlier versions of the edited parts simple and intuitive - without losing the changes you have made to the rest of the audio. ![]() Rather than tracking edit operations like most applications, WaveLab Elements 10 logs complete file versions. When we ran WaveLab Elements 10 through its paces here at Sweetwater, we were blown away by its new undo/redo history system - it’s a true lifesaver. One of the best undo/redo history systems on the planet You can also undock WaveLab Elements 10’s video window and resize it. And if the video’s sample rate doesn’t match your montage, creating a resampled copy is a breeze. Importing videos is a snap - just drag and drop. Using the same high-quality video engine as Cubase and Nuendo, WaveLab Elements 10 enables you to arrange, edit, and process the audio of a video, right from your Audio Montage. If you work with video, you’ll appreciate WaveLab Elements 10, thanks to its native video playback support. Video playback using Cubase and Nuendo’s video engine Xylophones, Glockenspiels & Keyboard Percussion.Cabled & Bluetooth/Wireless Controllers.Portable Recording & Hand Held Recorders.Busker / Portable / Battery Powered Amps.And Wavelab is perfectly suited to that job. That’s certainly part of what mastering is. One thing you wrote was correct though - that one of the reasons to use Wavelab or another editor is to make sure multiple tracks are tonally and dynamically cohesive. I think you’ve got a lot of things confused. Wavelab predates Izotope a fair bit my friend. I’ll keep mastering with the professional tools designed to make that critical job easier.ītw, Wavelab does not exist because computers were too slow to run more than one instance of Ozone. Listen - go ahead finish your albums in your DAW - as long as you believe that’s best choice for your music. Mastering is more important than ever for streaming due to changing loudness requirements and different target loudness standards for various streaming platforms. If you think mastering is dead - you’re crazy. In fact, vinyl was the strongest growth in music sales I think for a few years. Įxcept that cd’s and vinyl are still being made. If you really want to learn - go read about it, watch some videos, join r/wavelab. ![]() You don't sound like a serious mastering engineer - so it's not surprising that you don't understand the differences. Stop shitting on professional tools just because you don't want to invest in them. You want to master your project in a DAW - go ahead. People who use it aren't wasting their money. ![]() Wavelab has been around for a LONG time my friend. I'm just here to push back on anyone saying it's a waste of money. make it a great choice for mastering audio - if you can read, you can learn this yourself. And I'm not going to try to convince you by quoting the features and tools that Wavelab has which. Again - before you jump to conclusions - it's ok for you to "master" your music in Cubase if you want - go ahead. I also said that of course it's possible to master in a DAW - but professionals use tools designed for the task because it saves time and the features built in to a tool designed for mastering make doing the job easier, faster, better. I said people who master professionally know very well the difference between using an editor like Wavelab and working in a DAW. Second - I never said Wavelab gives you better mastering. it's not clear to me that you understand the difference. First - mixing is a separate process from mastering. Not sure if you're being a smartass or not, so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you're asking a genuine question. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |